High Speed Rail — NO!

by

Another note on the dangerous infatuation with high speed rail. This is by way of the Wall Street Journal quoting one of our nation’s great political thinkers writing in Newsweek, February 27th of this year, George Will.

Generations hence, when the river of time has worn this presidency’s importance to a small, smooth pebble in the stream of history, people will still marvel that its defining trait was a mania for high-speed rail projects. This disorder illuminates the progressive mind. . . .

Forever seeking Archimedean levers for prying the world in directions they prefer, progressives say they embrace high-speed rail for many reasons—to improve the climate, increase competitiveness, enhance national security, reduce congestion, and rationalize land use. The length of the list of reasons, and the flimsiness of each, points to this conclusion: the real reason for progressives’ passion for trains is their goal of diminishing Americans’ individualism in order to make them more amenable to collectivism.

To progressives, the best thing about railroads is that people riding them are not in automobiles, which are subversive of the deference on which progressivism depends. Automobiles go hither and yon, wherever and whenever the driver desires, without timetables. Automobiles encourage people to think they—unsupervised, untutored, and unscripted—are masters of their fates. The automobile encourages people in delusions of adequacy, which make them resistant to government by experts who know what choices people should make.

Time was, the progressive cry was “Workers of the world unite!” or “Power to the people!” Now it is less resonant: “All aboard!”

I hope my fellow rail fans aren’t seduced by the conceits of the so-called progressives. For much less money…much less…the government could support infrastructure improvements to create more passing sidings, restore double tracks where capacity was lifted long ago, and provide new equipment. Passenger trains commonly travelled at 80 even 90 miles per hour across the American landscape. We can provide alternatives to crowded airports and congested interstates and make passenger service viable again. We could have economic coach fares to encourage Americans to travel and, on the same trains, luxurious accommodations to attract business and leisure travelers. I wouldn’t mind paying for the opportunity to sit in an observation car sipping an icy martini while watching America whirl by. That’s something no one can do in America today. Not for any amount of money.

Advertisements

Tags:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: